The author of the post is not listed
The average portrait of a Russian gambler — debtor, alimony payer, and incapacitated.
So, in the Russian Federation, they want to ban them from betting. Legal bookmakers were shocked by this and asked to postpone this cringe.
They say: we will lose 40% of the audience, and we also need to pay 150–200 million rubles annually for the monitoring system. Have some conscience. We have neither money nor capacity. And your weak database with debtors won't withstand such an influx of requests.
Now let's consider a scenario where the law is still adopted in the fall. Will the addicted stop playing? Or maybe they will look for offshore operators, which currently make up 50% of the market?
The second is obvious. In my humble opinion, it was precisely the thoughts of legalizing the gambling sector that triggered the lively hunt for illegal business. Or, at least, it's not the least reason.
What we have in the near future: clearing all the shadow in the name of further legalization ➡️ pressure on addicted players and lack of alternatives ➡️ reduction in the turnover of legal bookmakers and, consequently, target deductions and taxes.
But the trouble is that no initiative will make a gambler stop playing. Just as any addict will find money for a dose, so will a player find something to bet on.
Demand creates supply. Therefore, no matter how much you suppress the shadow sector, it will still emerge. The more «oppressed» gamblers there are, the more tempting alternatives will appear.
Now we are witnessing a kind of race, who is smarter and faster:
— law enforcement with raids on offices
— casinos and bookmakers that need the market no matter what
One thing is clear for now. Soon the legal business will learn a little more about poverty. For everything that is done leads to a worse outcome for them.
В статье обсуждаются неудачные попытки Роскомнадзора заблокировать Telegram, замедление процесса блокировки и реакции пользователей на эти события.
The UK is discussing a bill to ban popular categories of porn, which could lead to censorship in Europe. The implications of such a ban on legal and illegal content are discussed.
The article examines the situation with the detention of Mostbet employees and possible consequences for the business. Connections with offshore companies and reactions to the events are discussed.
The article discusses an unexpected gift for Booster and his reaction to the contents of the equipment transport case. It examines the difficulties of the legal market and cultural aspects of gifts.
The article examines the new bookmaker 24bet, its connection with Fonbet, and opinions on its independence. Official statements and user reactions.
No articles by the author were found
AffGate.com is an independent analytical platform for iGaming, SEO, and digital marketing.
We collect data from official sources, structure information about markets, companies and technologies, and make the industry more transparent and understandable for professionals.
AffGate.com is not an online casino and does not provide access to gambling. All information is provided for educational and analytical purposes only.
© 2024-2026 AffGate.com.